Posted by: philipfontana | May 8, 2013

McSorley’s 2013

Three Sons & A Dad’s

McSorley’s Trip 2013

Image

     The facade of McSorley’s Old Ale House as it has looked since 1854 in New York City.   – – Located at #15 East 7th Street between 2nd & 3rd Avenues near Union Square & Cooper Union.

     Excuse us for living, but this April 2013 marked my fifth trip with my three sons to the one and only Mc Sorley’s Old Ale House in New York City. We have been doing so every other year since 2004. (Last year’s trip was postponed until now due to #2 son’s one and one-half year work sojourn in London.) To my delight, the “boys” seem almost more enthused than I am with each visit to my old haunt. Actually, I am thrilled too that we have this time together relating in a very unique way.

     As my sons’ jobs and abodes changed location over the years, so have the details of each trip. Suffice it to say, we all rendezvous at McSorley’s at 3:00 PM on a Saturday in the spring. The custom of this NYC landmark is to serve 2 mugs of ale, one dark and one light, at the same time to each person as “a round.” No trip is complete without a dish or two of American or Cheddar cheese, crackers, raw onions, and HOT mustard. Now the mustard is so hot, it requires an ale in hand to quickly wash this unique culinary treat down as fast as possible. This routine goes on for anywhere from 6 to 9 rounds. Now that totals 12 to 18 mugs a man! We’re talkin’ some serious beer drinkin’! To everyone’s amusement, an ever so brief mock business meeting of the “Three Sons & A Dad’s Club” is conducted by yours truly according to a loose interpretation of parliamentary procedure a` la Robert’s Rules of Order. Plenty of photographs are taken in the course of our spell at McSorley’s to incriminate all! We always terminate our visit by 5:00 PM. At that time, we take a traditional photo around one of the green barrels placed on the sidewalk outside the storefront. – – Cigars passed around to all concerned! Then, it is off to dinner with wine, of course, at a preordained, with much “research,” Italian restaurant nearby. Such evenings end with retreat, inevitably, to one son’s NYC apartment for an “overnighter” to sleep it off! – – Full diner breakfast Sunday morn & then everyone off on their respective trips back home.

Image

     Every trip to McSorley’s includes a photo like this of all four of us. Left to right after me is #2 son Peter, #1 son Andy, & #3 son Tom. We know this is “special” & “one for the ages.”

Image

     If you don’t try the cheese, crackers, raw onions, & HOT mustard at McSorley’s, you just haven’t been there! It’s part of the experience & what a treat, what fun!

Image

     Here we are leaving McSorley’s & taking another traditional photo with me sitting on one of the old barrels out front.

     The roots of this McSorley’s tradition date back to my years at Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, 1965. Members of the Rutgers Glee Club, to which I belonged, introduced me to McSorley’s one fateful weekend. It was love at first gulp! The atmosphere was infectious from the sawdust on the floor to the memorabilia on the walls going back to 1854, when its doors first opened. “We were here before you were born,” became McSorley’s motto, painted on the front window, at some point over the years. In those college days, “2 Draught Ale .30 cents,” says the menu (which hangs today in my house over my upright piano), “Coca Cola-Seven Up .20 cents, Cheese & Crackers & Onions $1.00 Large, .50 cents Small.” Even our meager college allowances could afford McSorley’s. And all we had to do as members of the Rutgers Glee Club was to break into song , as we inevitably did, and the clientele saw to it that we “drank free” with all the rounds they bought us. Today, the 2 drafts are up to $5.50 now! But the cheese and crackers are only $5.50….. “Go figure!”

Image

     Waiter Richard Buggy, known to all who frequent McSorley’s, proudly meets Andy a few years ago. He was waiting tables at McSorley’s  going back to my Rutgers years & I knew him then! He retired around 2010. On the wall of McSorley’s is a small newspaper article about Richard Buggy’s regular job as an NYC Police undercover cop in all sorts of disguises!

     McSorley’s Old Ale House is the oldest Irish tavern in New York City, founded by John McSorley in 1854, just a few years after he arrived from Ireland. It’s “claim to fame” was having been one of the last “Men’s Only” pubs. This practice ended in 1970 when the doors of McSorley’s opened to women as a result of a discrimination case brought to District Court and won. But the establishment took 16 years to add a proper “Ladies Room,” sharing a unisex bathroom with the gents all those years! The memorabilia on the walls is an eclectic collection from art work to newspaper articles, literary pieces, and items dating back in history and politics from photographs to campaign buttons and so much more! McSorley’s is considered one of New York City’s “top 5 Historic Bars,” located within the East Village/Lower East Side Historic District. Patrons of McSorley’s go back in history to include Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Peter Cooper, Woody Guthrie and a long list of literary figures.

Photos of McSorley’s Interior “Ambiance”  

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

     Excuse us for living, but to visit McSorley’s will add much to the “living” and with no need to “excuse”!

     Comments: Please! This was a real “fun write” with photos…almost as much fun as this last trip!  Thanks, guys for trip #5!!!

Posted by: philipfontana | April 18, 2013

Boston 2013

Boston

Dedicated to the three people who died thus far & the 180 seriously maimed & others injured. And dedicated to all those who assisted others & are still doing so.

Image

     Participants in the 2010 Boston Marathon. A tradition going back 116 years to 1897, the Boston Marathon has always been the iconic run to those of us for whom running has been our personal sport.

     Excuse us for living, but I was not writing a blog after September 11, 2001. So this is a dimension of the experience I could do without. But try to write on any other subject at this time. It falls flat and inappropriate. – – I know. And try to write about Boston and you want to shut up! Who needs to hear another thing unless you have some 2 cents worthy of people’s patience and consideration.

It is important to know for the sake of enforcing justice and future defense and prevention what kind of attack this was. Was this the work of an organized terrorist group, foreign or domestic, or that of a lone psychopath or two or some other form of evil motivation? Regardless, the result will and must be heightened security across the nation. Particularly, there will be more vigilance in our “public squares” at levels reaching closer down to municipal levels as opposed to just the big cities. The hysteria we feared after September 11 may indeed be here. Whether or not the intensity will fade may depend upon the results of the on-going investigations in Boston.

And that is the challenge of the dilemma we face as a nation at this time. We walk the delicate balance between freedom and security. Do we want to be a nation mirroring life in, say, downtown Tel Aviv? People feel relatively safe in this second most populous city in Israel next to Jerusalem as long as there is an armed soldier on a bus and a private security guard at the entrance of every café. And is such an armed society even possible in a land as large as that of the USA?

It remains to be seen whether “Boston” was the next act of terrorism after September 11 or, rather, another Oklahoma City-type event in our nation’s violent history. (Personally, I’d bet on the latter or homegrown terrorism. Pinpointing the Boston Marathon and Patriot’s Day smacks too strongly of an “insider’s American mentality.”) If it is the former, outright terrorism, we must remember and follow our September 11 experience:

1. What we must do to counter/fight terrorism.

2. What we can do better based on our experience.

3. What we do not have to do at all in terms of our overall reaction.

It is in that last one – – overreacting – – that I regret to say then terrorists become the victors.

Image

     An April 15, 2013 photo near the finish line of this year’s Boston Marathon. Other photos of the carnage are too difficult to bear.

     Excuse us for living, but there will be a Boston Marathon next year, the Boston authorities assure us. Let’s make sure that marathons, parades, and other public events continue throughout our land with whatever security measures we deem necessary when all is said and done.

    Comments: Please!

Posted by: philipfontana | March 27, 2013

U.S. Decline?

Is the United States In Decline?

What do YOU think?

That is what is most important!

 

     Excuse us for living, but these commentaries never aspired to even approach the standards of academic treatises. And so, I am not about to “get academic” on a topic so serious that I have been sitting on for some time now waiting through the “silly season” of the Presidential Election. “Is the United States in decline?” a subject that erupts from time to time over the decades, has been a popular topic once again over the past year 2012.

As I look over the array of materials on the topic, it seems to me that the discussion floats between our country being “in decline” and our country “being number one.” And while we can debate whether or not those two things are necessarily the same, I will forgo that debate and discuss them together as being one and the same for the sake of saying a few things here. Ah, I bet I hear all sorts of opinions out there already! Now I’m counting on many of you to respond under, “Comments: Please!” at the end of this post!

Where to begin? For me, it was one main article on the topic of U.S. decline that I will get to later. But it caused me to start looking, searching. There were books that came out on the subject in 2012:

Time To Start Thinking: America in the Age of Descent, by Edward Luce

Strategic Vision: America & the Crisis of Global Power, by Zbigniew Brzezinski

The World America Made, by Robert Kagan

That Used To Be Us: How America Fell Behind in the World It Invented & How We Can Come Back, by Thomas L. Friedman & Michael Mandelbaum

– – All reviewed conveniently in editions of The New York Times Book Review. But what about that one main article of which I spoke? Hold your horses! Not yet!

Image

     HBO’s newer series, “Newsroom,” stars Jeff Daniels, pictured above, as anchorman Will McAvoy. “Newsroom” is written by Aaron Sorkin of “West Wing” fame.

     Then, thanks to the Facebook news feed, I discovered from YouTube the beginning scene of the new HBO series that premiered June 24, 2012, “The Newsroom.” – –  starring Jeff Daniels as anchor Will McAvoy, written by none other than Aaron Sorkin! It was billed on YouTube as “The Most Honest Three Minutes in Television History.” The essence of it is “why America is no longer the greatest country in the world, but that it can be” again. You can easily Google the title for YouTube (re “The Most Honest Three Minutes in TV History”). I commend it as worthy of your time. – – really “good stuff.” Take a look at this on YouTube if you can.

OK. The Article! – – “Five Myths About America’s Decline,” by Ian Brenner. It appeared in The Washington Post, May 3, 2012. You can read it in its entirety by going to Google and type in “Ian Bremmer, Wikipedia.” There, scroll down to “Essays” and click on the eighth title listed. Also, “Who is Ian Bremmer?” might give you respect for his article. You can find that at the top of the same Wikipedia page too! – – Conservative, political scientist, professor at Columbia University. He is founder and president of Eurasia Group, a leading global political risk research and consulting firm. And last year, May 2012, he authored, Every Nation for Itself: Winners & Losers in a G-Zero World.

I will not attempt here to develop fully the five myths about America’s decline, but to summarize the essence of Bremmer’s article. He opens by stating that it is easy to conclude that “America is in an irreversible decline” based on “drawn-out wars, economic struggles, exploding debt,” and that “after a good run, it’s time to hand the superpower baton to China or some other up-and-comer.” Bremmer does not dispute that the U.S. was better off economically a decade ago. However, he continues, “those seeing decline as inevitable do not just ignore the nation’s history of resilience, they also misread the facts on the ground.” He then proceeds to name the five myths or common misconceptions and to debunk them in succinct, but superb detail:

The Five Myths:

1. The United States is no longer a superpower.

2. America’s economic future is bleak.

3. America’s political system is broken.

4. The United States will give way to a rising China.

5. The World no longer needs U.S. leadership.

Remember now, these are the five myths/misconceptions. The “meat” of the article is what Bremmer tells us that counters these myths. I regret these points are too lengthy to include here. He concludes with: “If America can engage the world with a narrower, self-interested focus, it will reap rewards. It will have the luxury of applying cost-benefit analysis before intervening abroad. It’s a downsized role, but don’t mistake it for decline.” (underlining added)

OK, so what do I think? – – Just don’t forget I want to know what some of you think under “Comments: Please!” Are we in decline? I say simply, “no.” I’ve been monitoring this question literally all my life starting when I was a history major at Rutgers in the 1960’s. But the world is drastically different and rapidly changing and so is the USA. We must develop a more sophisticated self-image and drop the 20th century neurotic notion of being #1 all the time, in everything! After all, we were not thought of as the world’s monolithic military power just a short 100 years ago! For that matter, industrially & technologically we were just getting rolling 100 years ago!

Image

     It started with Theodore Roosevelt’s presidency when the United States emerged as a world power. In 1901 when Vice President Teddy Roosevelt suddenly became president due to the assassination of President William McKinley, the U.S. Navy was the sixth largest in the world. By 1907 when TR sent the American Navy’s “Great White Fleet,” sixteen new battleships of the Atlantic Fleet all painted white, on a fourteen month friendship cruise around the world, the U.S. Navy had expanded to the second largest! And even in those times, President Roosevelt saw nothing wrong with the fact that we were second in size to Britain’s Royal Navy.

Image

     The image of strength and leadership as a nation took a giant leap forward with the presidency of Woodrow Wilson. Despite his 1916 re-election campaign motto, “He kept us out of war,” Wilson went on to lead us into World War I with the words, “Make the world safe for democracy.” The war in Europe had been in progress since 1914.  U.S. entry and participation in 1917 hastened an Allied victory by 1918. By then the United States had reached the stature of leading the peace with President Woodrow Wilson’s historic effort that culminated in the Treaty of Versailles in 1919.

Image

     That American image was solidified during the presidency of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. FDR soft-peddled our road to war, first with U.S. mobilization efforts beginning modestly in 1940 and then more aggressively with the Lend-Lease Act in 1941 to supply the Allies with needed materiel. But our fate was sealed on December 7, 1941 with the Japanese bombing of our bases at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. The United States entry into World War II and our subsequent military victories, economic and industrial might, development and use of the atomic bomb, under both Presidents Roosevelt and Truman to follow, sealed our fate. The United States only then became the #1 dominant force in the world, an image with which we are now left to wrestle.

     Excuse us for living, but despite all the negative talk, the USA is still by far the world’s economic powerhouse. Sure, the economic growth of China, Russia, India, Brazil, etc., is strong. But they have a long way to go to match the magnitude of all our economic indicators. We will be OK if we stop the political games in the Congress, curtail our debt, and concentrate on jobs, infrastructure, our industrial base, education, energy, a green America, violence, immigration, and more. And we do not have to be #1 in all of these either. We must strive to be a healthy nation once again, simply, with the military power we need to protect ourselves and justice around the globe when we deem it necessary and the economic prosperity to meet our needs at home and also let the arts flourish in America too. What do you think? For, that is more a determining factor here than has been discussed, i.e., our confidence and our will to carry the country we love forward!

Comments: Please!

Posted by: philipfontana | February 14, 2013

5th PastaPost

Fifth PastaPost

Spaghetti & All That Jazz

by

Phil & Geri

Image

     Excuse us for living, but it’s about time we get back to more important things with another PastaPost recipe. By all statistical indicators of viewers, that these PastaPosts are more popular than any news and commentary is no surprise! And I am beginning to realize that each recipe comes with a story re how it came about.

“Spaghetti & All That Jazz” started out as a simple, innocent Sicilian dish. – – Kind of a “peasant food” every ethnic group has. We grew up calling it, “Spaghetti & Butter,” because that’s all it was! – – A little spaghetti (Well, not so little. Maybe a pound for 2 people!), a little reserved pasta water, butter melted into the pot of pasta, and your favorite grated cheese to taste. After many years of marriage, Geri and I got up enough nerve to resurrect this dish from my childhood. We rediscovered how good it really was as embarrassingly plain and simple it be! And it had the added virtue (and our real motivation) of being “sans garlic” for those famous “Friday Night” dinners (See the post by that title in the archives here!)  followed by a social event on Saturday or Sunday. So, we kept “Spaghetti & Butter” in mind and made it “once in a blue moon” over the years.

But then came one of those magical Friday Nights this past year 2012 like days of old when we “invented” a new recipe spontaneously. We were “going out” on a Saturday and decided to have Spaghetti & Butter. As the day approached late afternoon, I upped and said to Geri, “I feel like a little something more. That’s too boring, plain.” “What do you have in mind?” said Geri. “It needs some jazz, something to make it more interesting,” I said. “Like what?” she egged me on. “Maybe some black olives and capers. And sundried tomatoes…I always love those.” And that’s all I ever have to say to Geri. She is the master chef, takes the ball and runs with it, knows just what to do. To the above, she added scallions, red pepper, parsley, and followed through with the butter, grated cheese, and no garlic.

And voila! Ambrosia! It was born! Now what to call it? Jazz? Geri had gone beyond that with all that jazz. What came naturally to our minds was the song, “And All That Jazz,” from one of our very favorite movies, “Chicago,” which brought to the screen that great Bob Fosse Broadway production (still going strong as the number one longest running AMERICAN musical in Broadway history!). What else to call it but, “Spaghetti & All That Jazz.” And it’s so good. How good? Adding garlic spoils it! We know!

Image

     Catherine Zeta-Jones (right) & Renee Zellweger sing, “And All That Jazz,” in the 2002 motion picture, “Chicago.”

     Presenting…

 

…Spaghetti & All That Jazz

 

1 stick of butter cut into 2 halves

1 med. bunch of scallions (sliced 1/4” thick)

1/2 tsp. crushed red pepper flakes

1 cup sliced black olives

1 cup coarse chopped sundried tomatoes in oil

1/4 cup oil from sundried tomatoes

1/3 cup capers (try to buy larger capers, Roland brand in ShopRite)

1 cup fresh parsley (coarse chopped)

1/2 lb. Vermicelli pasta (spaghetti)

1 tbs. salt

3-4 quarts boiling water

grated cheese to taste (Pecorino-Romano or your favorite)

Melt 1/2 stick of butter in medium sauce pan. Add scallions & red pepper flakes & saute` until tender, 3-5 minutes. Add oil from sundried tomatoes & sundried tomatoes & heat gently. Remove from heat. Cook pasta in boiling salted water until al dente. Drain in colander. Toss with sauce, & add the black olives, capers, parsley, & the other 1/2 stick butter.

Use grated cheese at the table to individual taste!

Makes 2 generous servings!

Excuse us for living, but add this to the pasta recipes we love!

Comments: Please, before or after you make it!

Posted by: philipfontana | January 24, 2013

Newspapers Decline

Newspapers Decline

Compounded

By a Self-fulfilling Prophecy?

Image

     Pictured above, the recent Broadway show, “Newsies,” about the Newsboys Strike of 1899 in New York City.

     Excuse us for living, but some of us grew up in the heyday of the American newspaper industry in the 1940’s! And the growing population helped circulation numbers increase until the 1970’s. Those circulation levels remained stable until the 1990’s when the numbers began to decline. The toll of radio, television, and more recently the internet were too much for the printed word. The downward trend of circulation numbers and advertisement revenues have been undoubtedly devastating to the print media and its publishers, not only newspapers but news magazines as well. However, maybe there is a “Catch-22,” a self-fulfilling prophecy, in this dilemma. Just maybe this downslide can be offset by the newspapers and news magazines not giving up. They must rediscover their mission of providing diversified information to educate the public-at-large.

The statistics spell out this factual truth. From the Pew Research Center, “The State of the News Media 2012,” and other sources:

Circulation of daily newspapers: 62 million, 1990, down to 43 million, 2010 (Sunday circulation about the same).

Advertising revenues of newspapers: $46 million, 2003, down to $24 million, 2011.

Number of daily newspapers: 1,611, 1990. reduced to 1,387, 2009.

Circulation of news magazines: down -1%, 2008, -2.2%, 2009, -1.5%, 2010.

Advertising revenues of news magazines: down -12%, 2008, -25%, 2009, & “stopped the bleeding” flat at -.1%, 2010.

Hand-in-hand with this steady decline in the print circulation and the accompanying drop in advertising revenues has been the transition to and increase in digital journalism. This internet news and analysis not only includes websites and their blogs such as huffingtonpost.com, but also newspaper and news magazine on-line versions/editions while they continue their hard-copy publications as well.

But the salutary point here is that the newspapers and news magazines themselves do not make the situation/the trend any better by their actions. In fact, often their hardcopy editions and on-line versions resemble one-another, each trying to look like the other! The “Catch-22,” the self-fulfilling prophecy compounding the problem, goes something like this: circulation decreases, resulting in lower advertising revenues, causing a downsizing of the number of pages in the periodical. Then since the publication is smaller and offers less information, the readership declines, revenues continue to drop, the number of pages shrink, and the cycle down-spirals.

Image

          Newsweek, a striking example of this collateral damage, saw its demise hastened. Then Editor Jon Meacham attempted in May 2009 to make Newsweek read more like an intellectual journal. After 77 years, 1933-2010, it was sold for $1.00 & assumption of $50 million in liabilities by the Washington Post Company in 2010. Newsweek ceased as a print publication December 31, 2012 & put out its first digital only issue January 4, 2013, merging with thedailybeast.com.

     Now just maybe this downslide could be slowed, stopped, if not reversed by newspapers and news magazines hanging tough. Don’t “cut and run,” but rediscover yourself and how it all began. Publications used to be the source of information which broadened the horizons of the reader, i.e., educated its readership. Newspapers and news magazines used to be mini-versions of The New York Times on Sundays with its various sections from news to the arts, books, business, sports and the like. – – Kind of a daily or weekly Cultural Literacy, a book by E. D. Hirsch, 1988, in which the author describes and provides the basic knowledge, background information, that enables a person to function in our contemporary American society.

Instead, what we have is dumbed-down editions which assume the reader gets his or her news and information elsewhere. And guess what? The self-fulfilling prophecy is they do! People go to their favorite TV cable program or website that tells them exactly what they wish to hear and know in their niche of information.

Never mind that people just might learn something, gain something, by being exposed to a broad spectrum of information that they would peruse on their way to that topic they are looking for.  Indeed, they might stop and read something from another field beside their own and learn something, perhaps, about art, history, literature, etc. It may even give them a new idea that they can use in their respective fields of work.

Excuse us for living, but that’s what the newspaper, the news magazine, used to do for us. The mission was to provide diversified information to educate us. Only a citizenry armed with sufficient information on a wide range of topics can take a look at our American past, deal with the present, and address the problems of our common future.

     Comments: Please, besides the fact that the below sources are mostly on-line and that this is an on-line blog and not a newspaper column!!!

Sources: Wikipedia.org, multimedia.journalism.berkely.edu, stateofthemedia.org, Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs To Know, 1988, by E. D. Hirsch, Jr.

 

Posted by: philipfontana | January 4, 2013

Gridlock R Us

Maybe Gridlock Starts with Us!

And

Happy New Year 2013!

Image

Are you old enough to remember the TV sitcom, “All in the Family,” 1971-1979? No one could debate & misconstrue issues in the news better than the character, Archie Bunker, played by Carroll O’Connor. He opposed his liberal son-in-law, Michael, not so affectionately referred to by Archie as “Meathead,” played by Rob Reiner.

     Excuse us for living, but some of us are old enough to remember the TV sitcom, “All in the Family,” 1971-1979, before it was in reruns! No better example of family squabbles over politics can be cited. We still have vivid memories of “Archie” and son-in-law “Meathead,” Michael, debating, arguing about the political issues of that era. And while the show was a satirical vehicle to register serious liberal political viewpoints, Archie’s crude portrayal of conservative opinions had its secret admirers. In today’s political climate such a show would be impossible. But the point is that Archie and Meathead were at least talking, arguing, & genuinely engaging each other in political discourse.

The more common experience among family and friends at social gatherings, going back decades and decades, has been to follow the cardinal rule of refraining from discussing politics and religion. Plus, every family had its “old Uncle Harry” or someone with whom you avoided such topics in his presence like the plague for fear of “getting him going.” It was really a self-imposed “gridlock” of sorts among family and friends, the kind that we associate more with and blame the Congress for today.

Image

     And on that score, the January 1, 2013 vote on the so called “fiscal cliff” tax bill by the House of Representatives, pushing mid-night, was a far cry from bipartisanship and the end of Congressional gridlock. After the Senate vote the night before, on New Year’s Eve, 89 to 8 approving the measure, the House vote was much less impressive. The bill passed with 257 Yeas and 167 Nays. Speaker John Boehner (R) could only muster 85 Republicans to add to 172 Democrats supporting the bill. – – Bipartisanship? – – End of gridlock? I don’t think so. But it is a start. Hold your breath in the weeks to come with the debt ceiling bill and the “sequester bill” on entitlement and defense cuts.

At this point, none of these political shenanigans surprise us. We’ve been through this drill before. But what was on my mind, even before this most recent political melodrama, was the way we behave, the way we conduct our discourse, or the lack thereof, as American citizens. And just maybe the political gridlock in the Congress and in our State Houses across the country starts with us, reflects us! As Election Day 2012 got closer and closer, our inability to conduct a discourse with those we disagree politically was never more pronounced. And in the aftermath of the Election, the animus almost seemed to intensify. Storm Sandy and its aftermath, occurring simultaneous to the Election, did not seem to soften any hearts, but added “coal to the fire,” no pun intended, with intense opinions about global warming. Only the heart-wrenching loss of innocent children at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut seemed to give some people pause…only to slip into animosities over gun control and the Second Amendment and the NRA.

I base this unscientific conclusion on my own observations and experiences. – – From the insidious “Forwards” in our e-mail inbox, to real e-mails, and in the social media, from Facebook to Twitter. Whether friend or family member, some people were actually driven to “unfriend” people on Facebook because they disagreed with the political postings of others on the so-called “news feed.”

What’s missing is a genuine discussion among people who “agree to disagree” and maybe even a little reading/research beyond what we see on television. – – Whether socially or on the telephone, texting, e-mailing, or through the social media like Facebook. The exchange of “canned” Forwards through e-mails or links on Facebook to other sites is not discourse. It’s more like a war! “I’ll throw this at you and you throw that back at me!” Unfortunately, the closest people get to real discourse is among friends and relatives who agree and reinforce what people already think and believe!

Excuse us for living, but maybe Congress, as the representative body that it is supposed to be, reflects the society at large, us! Maybe Congress cannot agree, talk to one-another, compromise, and vote in an expeditious way because we are incapable of doing so ourselves as the, supposed, informed citizens of America. Maybe gridlock starts with us!

And Happy New Year 2013!

     Comments: Please!

Posted by: philipfontana | December 20, 2012

Christmas 2012

Christmas 2012

Image

Really singing “Jingle Bells,” 2011

When Christmas through the ages

Became Christmas as we a – ged.

May this Christmas make you eternally young

And may this New Year 2013 be one of many!

 

What words of wisdom in these times in which we live?

“We are in this together. Keep calm & carry on.”

Those are the most helpful words I’ve found here & there.

Be well & take care of yourself & those you love & your communities.

Phil & Geri too!

                  Comments: Always welcome!

Posted by: philipfontana | December 6, 2012

Rutgers’ Triple Play!

                                                   

                                                  Rutgers’ Triple Play !

                                                       Merger: Win!

                                                       Big Ten: Win!

                                                   Big East: Shared!

                                               It’s All in the Numbers!

Image

“Old Queens,” the original & only Rutgers’ building from its inception in 1766, New Brunswick, New Jersey

     Excuse us for living, but simply put, Rutgers had quite a week in and around Thanksgiving!   – – -So big that the end story had to wait until the next week. And it’s all in the numbers as they say.

First came the vote on the Rutgers’ merger with UMDNJ (the University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey) on Monday, November 19, 2012. A joint meeting of the Rutgers University Boards of Governors and Trustees voted overwhelmingly in favor of the historic restructuring. The Board of Governors voted 11-0 in approval. The Trustees voted 59-51 approval with 8 either abstaining or absent.

The merger will go into effect July 1, 2013 and give Rutgers the medical school it has not had since the 1960’s. (Actually, two medical schools and a cancer research center) But look at the numbers!!! There will be $45-75 million spent over the next year or two for consultants, attorneys, and financial experts just on the UMDNJ takeover itself. Then Rutgers will take on $456 million of UMDNJ’s debt, which by the way may cause Rutgers’ Aa2 credit rating to be lowered. While Rutgers’ officials are prepared for this eventuality, it may be more expensive for Rutgers to borrow money in the future. Rutgers’ student body will grow from the present 57,000 to 65,000 students. Its employees now at 8,000, Rutgers will take on an additional 15,000 UMDNJ personnel, totaling some 23,000 staff members! And Rutgers’ present budget of $1.37 billion will grow to a combined $3 billion.

Despite all these dizzying numbers, Rutgers’ new President, Robert Barchi, is enthusiastic that the merger will create a research university with greater potential future opportunities for Rutgers and the State of New Jersey. Members of the Rutgers Board of Governors estimate that the takeover could elevate Rutgers to the top 25 most elite research universities in America. Regardless, by statute dated June 28, 2012, the New Jersey State Legislature created a new “Rutgers School of Biomedical Health Sciences,” effective July 1, 2013. Now the Rutgers Boards by their vote have made it a “done deal.” It’s now official following the letter of the law that created the modern day Rutgers back in 1956 and requires the approval of the Boards.

Image

     And that was Monday! The next day, Tuesday, November 20, 2012, Rutgers Athletic Director Tim Pernetti announced that Rutgers Scarlet Knights would be leaving the Big East and join the Big Ten. The announcement was made at the Hale [Athletic] Center on campus with the Big Ten Commissioner and king maker Jim Delany and Rutgers President Robert Barchi on the dais. And while it may have seemed like this turn of events was coming for days into weeks and months, it was actually years in the making between Pernetti & Delany. And no wonder the excitement. Jim Delany is among the top-10 most powerful people in sports. He’s the one man show who created the BCS and finally agreed to change the playoff system by 2014. The TV network he created as Big Ten Commissioner generates enormous rights, fees, and airs in 26 countries.

Again, let’s look at the numbers to understand this development, this move, at least from the Rutgers’ perspective. Rutgers will become the Big Ten’s 14th member after the University of Maryland joins the league, target date 2014. Since Rutgers has been in the Big East since 1991, even this year will only generate $6 million in royalties. Yes, there will be a $10 million penalty for leaving the Big East and a 27 month wait, although there is a precedent for earlier release. But presently, Rutgers subsidizes over 47% of its $60 million athletic budget. That’s $28 million a year! In contrast, Big Ten schools subsidies range as low as 0% to an average of 5% and a high of only 9%. Now watch the numbers! When Rutgers reaches a full share by year six in the Big Ten, it will receive in excess of the $42 million each year that Big Ten schools will get starting in 2017. – – Television revenues, etc.

President Barchi does boast the academic opportunities that will be availed Rutgers through the Conference’s academic arm (and they are numerous and worthwhile). And he reminds us that the Big Ten “really represents our academic peers” and points to our student athletes’ 3.0 GPA. But President Barchi admits it’s about the money when he adds, “Athletics is an excellent marketing tool” that creates all kinds of opportunities. The numbers again! Just as, why would the Big Ten want Rutgers? Simply, with Rutgers’ proximity to New York City, the Big Ten Network will tap into a massive television market! – – All in the numbers!

Image

     And that was only Tuesday! – – Busy week on the banks of the Raritan River in New Brunswick, NJ, for Rutgers! So, off to an away game at Pittsburg, Saturday, November 24, and a possible Big East title for Rutgers and first season Head Coach Kyle Flood, undefeated 5 & 0 in the league so far! But it was a Rutgers’ 27-6 defeat at the hands of Pittsburgh as if Rutgers “never showed.” Talk about the numbers! A win would have meant a clean Rutgers’ victory, a first Big East league title with Louisville’s defeat that same night at the hands of UConn 23-20.

Image

Rutgers’ home High Point Solutions Stadium

     Ah, but not to despair! There was still Rutgers vs. Louisville, bringing this Trifecta of a Rutgers’ saga (merger, Big Ten, & maybe a Big East title) into the next week. Now it was Thursday, November 29, and Rutgers could win the Big East crown all for itself again with a win at its home High Point Solutions Stadium! NO! – – Final score Louisville 20-Rutgers 17, a real squeaker by the score, but in reality Louisville in strong control the second half of the game and dominant. Here go the numbers again. Rutgers and Louisville were left with a clinched four-way share of the regular season Big East Championship title, both teams with 5-2 records in league play along with the same for Cincinnati and Syracuse. (Overall Louisville 10 & 2, Rutgers 9 & 3 for the season) Louisville will go on to a prestigious BCS bowl, the Sugar Bowl, on January 2 against Florida 11 &1. And Rutgers will go to its 7th bowl appearance in 8 years with the Russell Athletic Bowl, Orlando Florida, on December 28, against Virginia Tech 6 & 6, Rutgers going for a rare 10-win season.

Image

     Excuse us for living, but what a week and a half for Rutgers that saw triumphs with its merger with the medical schools and its invitation and acceptance into the Big Ten. And then it was all in the numbers and but for 4 points (losing 20-17 to Louisville) Rutgers would have won the Big East title outright and be on its way to the Sugar Bowl. But Rutgers did win a share as a Big East Champion and now the Scarlet Knights  must once again await the next football season of 2013.

Comments: Please!

Sources: The Star-Ledger and Daily Record newspapers, msn.foxsports.com

 


Posted by: philipfontana | November 20, 2012

Giving Thanks 2012

From Our House to Yours

HAPPY THANKSGIVING

2012

Image

   Norman Rockwell’s classic, “Freedom From Want,” 1943, painted by him as an outgrowth of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s “Four Freedoms Speech” of 1941.

     Excuse us for living, but this Thanksgiving it seems appropriate to give thanks for “what” we have instead of the usual “all” we have. Let us remember those in need, whether it be those suffering from storm’s wrath or otherwise. And may we pray to be a true community of people working together to face the future in our towns, states and our nation.

Comments: Please!

Posted by: philipfontana | November 10, 2012

President Sandy

                                                       President Sandy:

                                                         The Election

                                                                &

                                                         Storm Sandy

 

 Excuse us for living, but the monumental storm Sandy, plus the Presidential Election sandwiched amidst our struggle in the storm’s aftermath, were collectively another notch in what has become my mantra. We are just trying to make our way through our retirement years that we had looked forward to with optimism and bright expectations. Then, first came the Great Recession and now this. Our hearts are heavy with the loss of life and property up and down the east coast into New England. But the devastation of the storm’s landfall right on the New Jersey shore, and the destruction to New York City and the immediate area, are more than people can bear. So having been dealt lemons, as the saying goes, let’s see if we can make some lemonade out of all of this.

Image

President Obama & Governor Christie toured the ravaged New Jersey shore in Marine One.

     Sandy and the Elections say it all for us in a nutshell. We must all work together to rebuild, whether it be our State or our Nation. We must accept the outcome of this November’s elections. Gridlock must end. Problems must be addressed. The time is now. Embrace and support our President. We are in this together and all on the same team called America. Contact your Congressman and tell him/her, “Let’s get going!”

Image

President Obama & the First Family at the election night celebration in the McCormick Place Convention Center, Chicago

     And one more thought to tie this together…the Election and Storm Sandy. The economy. Jobs are #1. Accept reality. Spaceship earth’s environment is changing. We must live/build in harmony with it, preserve it, the only earth we have! Put aside labels like “global warming” and “climate change,” if that helps bring us together, and just look out the window. The weather’s gales and the ocean’s waves will tell you the conditions we face. This is about survival. Jobs are issue #1 and so rebuilding from Sandy in our states and a green environment and energy and infrastructure nationally all interrelate/combine into “job one.” And while we are at it, how about rebuilding our industrial base to help us get the work done! We can’t have life as we know it without working ON and AT that  piece of terra firma we call Home and our Nation too!

Image

Left, “My home was destroyed by Hurricane Sandy.” Right, “No it wasn’t.” The Man in the dark suit is labeled, “Climate Change Deniers,” as it appeared in The Star-Ledger newspaper in the days following storm Sandy.

     Excuse us for living, in whatever form, life goes on until we die. In the meantime, let us survive!

Comments: Please!

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories