I Can Dream Can’t I
or
How Congress Can Start Passing Laws Again!
(WARNING! Boring reading may be hazardous to your health!)
2009 aerial photo of the National Defense University on the Potomac River, Fort McNair, Washington, DC
Excuse us for living, but some of us remember a CD from way back in 1988 by Michael Feinstein (No, he is not Lady Gaga’s grandfather!) titled, Isn’t It Romantic. Anyway, the CD included an equally great song, I Can Dream Can’t I. Wikipedia tells me that song came from a 1938 “flop” musical, Right This Way (way before I was born, and it ran only 15 performances), composed by Sammy Fain and Irving Kahal (who? But a nice rendition by Michael for your iPod!) Anyway, all this is an unnecessary rant to get “dreamy” about a serious political subject dear to my heart. It has “nothing and everything” to do with the political scene today and this election season 2012, both presidential and congressional. Plus, the subject is non-partisan and strikes a cord regarding the political discord of these times.
I am talking about (finally!) the formation of public policy, or, put more simply, how we go about writing laws to address our nation’s problems. And so the word “dream” is apt because this discussion is about “what ought to be” or “should be” in a perfect world, as opposed to “what is possible” or “will be” in reality. In plain English, this means it ain’t going to happen! But “I Can Dream Can’t I” ?
The premise here is that our legislative process, the Congress if you will, no longer works. Put aside for the moment, if you can, all the present rancor, discord, partisan bickering, and, thus, gridlock. Right now you can blame it on the Tea Party. The Tea Party is definitely a worthy scapegoat for the dysfunction of our times. However, a look back through any American history book will tell you that we have been fighting and compromising since 1776. It’s the American way! It makes you marvel at how we ever got this far so successfully as a nation. Our Constitution has served us well and still does.
What is increasingly and alarmingly different today is our advanced technological and global environment. Many issues defy solution and progress by the “business as usual” approach of compromise and legislate. A higher level of expertise, both technical and legal, is needed to address the problems/the issues of our day. –From biotechnology to climate change/the environment/energy, a coherent foreign policy, terrorism and Homeland Security, education, immigration, cyber-space, abortion, marriage, to “bread and butter issues” of the economy such as jobs/manufacturing/trade/the deficit and national debt, plus healthcare, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, all the entitlement programs, to name a few!
Now let’s dream! To provide the White House and the Congress with the kind of legislation necessary, a nonpartisan public policy institution is needed. We already have a National Defense University. (The National War College is just one of its five sub-colleges.) Why not have a “National Public Policy University”? Experts on all sides of a given issue (politically, philosophically, technologically, and legally) would come together. They would define the problem, select a problem solving model/method (the academics like and need that!), settle on various alternative solutions to the problem, and then, finally, recommend a public policy to the Congress, i.e., bills to vote into laws!!!
How else will we ever get from point A to point B on any given problem/issue? We drift from one President and Congress to another on complex problems with a patchwork of legislation. Perhaps this worked in the past, but it does not seem to be working, serving us any longer. We need a coherent approach and stick to it. There would still be ample opportunity in the legislative process for compromise when recommendations get to the Congress. And, naturally, further legislation might be needed to “tweak” our course along the way or to drastically alter our approach should it not be working.
Maybe we are ready to raise the bar to a higher level of thinking in the formation of public policy, i.e., how we go about writing the bills that become our laws. Only then can our ship of State make steady progress from point A to point B on the great issues of our time.
“It ain’t going to happen,” you say?
“I Can Dream Can’t I,” goes the song!
Comments: What do you think?







It was just last weekend that I sat down to put my words on paper, so to speak, Windows actually, to see if what was going on in my head had the makings of an article with some substance. I was pleasantly surprised upon reading the first draft that I definitely was on to something worthwhile for me and my senior peers. I polished and revised it the next day and by Sunday night it was e-mailed to two newspapers. To my surprise, the one newspaper that chose my article for publication did not contact me as per standard journalistic procedure. They went to press with my article based on my record of previously published articles in that periodical, the Morris County, New Jersey newspaper, the Daily Record. My article which follows was published on the Editorial Page of the Daily Record on Wednesday, January 25, 2012.
Excuse Us For Living
Excuse us for living, but you can’t blame this one on all of us Baby Boomers who turned 65 last year in 2011. It was Governor Chris Christie who proposed cutting New Jersey’s State income tax 10% “across the board” over the next 3 years starting in fiscal 2013. How can he reconcile this proposal with the State of New Jersey’s shortfall to the pension fund of $54 billion? The math does not agree with Governor Christie’s proclamation in his recent State of the State address that “the New Jersey comeback has begun.”
Excuse us for living, but all we were doing forty some years ago was looking for employment. Fresh out of college, some of us returning from the war in Vietnam, we needed jobs. I became a teacher. We didn’t have the foggiest notion that State pension benefits would be projected to be a $5 billion yearly contribution on the part of the State by the year 2018!
Excuse us for living, but when we entered the workforce, Medicare was brand new under a revision of the Social Security Act in 1965. We could not possibly have imagined almost half a century later that its behemoth financial implications as a Federal budget entitlement would total $516 billion in benefits for 2010. All our years of employment, it was just another deduction on our pay slips.
Excuse us for living, but as far as Social Security was concerned, it had existed for decades, since 1935, when we entered the work force. As far as we knew, again, it was just another payroll deduction we accepted as a workplace requirement. In fact, the age of retirement for full Social Security was raised upward from 65 on a sliding scale based on our year of birth. Yet, despite such reform efforts, the Social Security entitlement totaled $712.5 billion for the year 2010.
Excuse us for living, but many of us did not live extravagantly, but used credit cards in our early married years to get by and paid them off yearly. We bought used cars. A down payment of 25% purchased our first home at mortgage rates of 9+% interest, only to see our home values severely plummet now in our early retirement years. And finally, in our last 20-25 years of work, once children’s college educations were paid for, we were able to put money in the bank as our retirement “nest egg.”
Excuse us for living, but our lives have fallen far short of the dreams we had for our retirement years. Sadly, September 11, 2001 took the lives of over 3000 innocent people and shattered the lives of their loved ones forever. For our selfish selves, it has meant living in a world of fear: terrorism and wars and security restrictions and infringements on our freedoms.
Excuse us for living, but the economic plunge of 2008 and the Great Recession have frozen our twilight years at best. Perhaps, “the norm” will recover and the “boom and bust” economic cycle will once again rebound into something somewhat closer to what we used to call “prosperity.” But the facts are that not everyone’s 401(k)s have recovered the losses of 2008. And for those of us of more modest means, we live with .9% interest on our savings accounts and .7% interest on our checking. CD rates at the highest are 2.68% for five years and deferred fixed annuities are in the 2+% range for five years. The brightest star so far has been the Social Security 3.6% Cost Of Living Adjustment (COLA) for 2012 after zero dollars in the previous year. That’s encouraging since Governor Christie and the State Legislature in the newly adopted pension reforms of 2011 suspended pension COLAs until the pension fund is solvent, projected to take 30 years, when we are all pushing up daisies.
Excuse us for living, but we will carry on despite it all. We will count our blessings, maybe even including an extra $80 for a taxpayer with $50,000 income from Governor Christie’s proposed 10% income tax cut.
Excuse us for living.
33 Comments
Posted in Commentary, National Economy, National Politics